Maternal Characteristics and Infant Outcomes in Appalachia and the Delta
Posted on by
Questions for Anne Driscoll, Lead Author of ”Maternal Characteristics and Infant Outcomes in Appalachia and the Delta.”
Q: Why did you decide to do focus your report on maternal characteristics and infant outcomes in the Appalachia and Delta?
AD: The general goal was to explore regional patterns in health risk factors and outcomes.
Q: How did the data vary by region?
AD: In general, maternal characteristics and infant outcomes were the worst in the Delta, followed by Appalachia; they were generally best in the rest of the U.S.
Q: Was there a specific finding in your report that surprised you?
AD: Although outcomes did vary across regions for infants born to non-Hispanic white and black women, they did differ between Appalachia and the Delta for infants of Hispanic women and usually did not differ between these two regions and the rest of the U.S.
Q: What is the take home message for this report?
AD: Differences in maternal characteristics account for some, but not all, of the differences in infant outcomes between Appalachia, the Delta and the rest of the U.S.
Q: Why do you think there are differences in maternal characteristics among the Delta, Appalachia and the rest of the U.S.?
AD: Appalachia and the Delta are two of the most disadvantaged regions in the U.S., with higher poverty, poorer overall health (behaviors and outcomes) and lower educational levels than the U.S. as a whole. We would expect that the characteristics of women giving birth in these regions to reflect these patterns (e.g., lower educational attainment, higher rates of obesity and smoking, and higher rates of WIC receipt and Medicaid).