Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

NIOSH Science Blog

Safer Healthier Workers

Share
Compartir

A Comprehensive Approach to Workforce Health

Categories: At-risk Populations, Manufacturing, Total Worker Health

man operating machineryThe health of the U.S. workforce is an issue of importance to both workers and their employers. There is a wealth of evidence on occupational safety and health hazards that may potentially affect workers’ health. In addition to these hazards, personal characteristics and conditions, such as age, gender, genetics, or weight, can impact a person’s work and interact with workplace hazards. Individual characteristics and conditions may change the way workers respond to hazards which they may be exposed to on the job. In addition, employers face burgeoning costs of workforce healthcare which affect their companies’ productivity and profitability, and can constrain growth (ACOEM 2009; Hymel 2011). Maintaining a well-functioning workforce is increasingly critical as the workforce ages and is burdened on a personal level and financially by chronic disease. These issues affect U.S. well-being and competitiveness in the global environment. However, such work and personal factors are generally not considered together. Rather, they have been addressed separately. One impact of this traditional approach to occupational and personal risk factors is that the workforce suffers and subsequently the well-being of the nation is diminished.

In our recent paper published in the American Journal of Public Health, we provide a framework for considering the health of working people in a comprehensive manner (Schulte et al., 2011). As we mentioned, historically, work and personal factors have been considered separately. This separation of work and personal factors is due to the historic development of the labor and employment contract to limit liability. Subsequently, legislation to protect workers focused primarily on workplace hazards. However, most of the diseases and health conditions experienced by workers are influenced by multiple factors. The need exists for more research into the causes of diseases, and relevant interventions, which investigates the interaction of occupational risk factors and personal risk factors.

While the need for this research pertains to workers of all ages, it is particularly needed for older workers as our workforce ages. As the ACOEM (2009) noted, “The United States needs an able and available workforce to compete in the global economy, and to do this, must maintain a critical balance of net contributors versus net dependents. The current workforce of net contributors is aging and is increasingly burdened with chronic illnesses, functional impairment, and work disability, some of which could have been prevented, delayed, or mitigated.” One example of unique risk factors for older workers examined in our paper is how hearing loss experienced with increasing age might be further affected by exposure to organic solvents that could potentially cause additional hearing damage.

In our paper, the interactions between personal risk factors and occupational risk factors are described by four models that combine both work and personal risk factors. Using these models, we examined eight personal risk factors, genetics, age, gender, chronic disease, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, and prescription drug use, resulting in 32 examples presented in this paper. One illustration of a model in which a personal risk factor might change the effect of an occupational exposure on health is in the role of obesity in the development of osteoarthritis among workers whose jobs may necessitate kneeling or squatting. Another example relates to the variable risks for bladder cancer that can occur among workers who possess different NAT2 (a gene involved in the metabolism of dyes) gene alleles (alternate form of a gene), and who are exposed to various types of aromatic amine compounds (compounds used to make dyes). In this situation, workers with certain types of NAT2 polymorphisms (form of gene with different observable properties) have an increased risk of bladder cancer when exposed to certain aromatic amines, while workers with other NAT2 polymorphisms may be protected from developing bladder cancer when exposed to benzidine in the absence of other aromatic amine exposures. Framing of these issues is important to help raise awareness among occupational medicine and primary care clinicians of the interactions of personal risk factors and occupational risk factors, since such interactions can influence diagnosis, treatment, intervention, and prognosis. It has long been recommended that primary care practitioners take an occupational history, and more recently, the case is being made to include occupational information in electronic medical records (IOM 2011).

We also note that “explaining the distribution of health and disease exclusively in terms of risk factors only partly addresses the health of the workforce.” There is still a need to understand other factors that may play a role in the health of the workforce, including social, economic, cultural, political, and environmental variables.

There is a growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of workplace interventions for occupational outcomes (e.g., musculoskeletal disorders, mental health) and personal factors (e.g., smoking and overweight). Future models for interventions that consider both work and personal risk factors would provide a foundation for an integrated worklife approach that combines health protection from workplace hazards and health promotion. This approach is advocated by NIOSH through its Total Worker Health program. Ultimately, consideration of the totality of the health of the workforce is a prescription for better health and well-being of the nation.

We welcome your thoughts on these issues.

Dr. Schulte is the Director of the NIOSH Education and Information Division.

Dr. Pandalai is a medical officer in the Risk Evaluation Branch of NIOSH’s Education and Information Division.

Works Cited

  1. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) [2009]. Healthy workforce/healthy economy: the role of health, productivity, and disability management in addressing the nation’s health care crisis: why an emphasis on the health of the workforce is vital to the health of the economy. J Occup Environ Med 51(1):114-119.
  2. Hymel PA, Loeppke RR, Baase CM, Burton WN, Hartenbaum NP, Hudson TW, et al [2011]. Workplace Health Protection and Promotion A New Pathway for a Healthier-and Safer-Workforce. J Occup Environ Med 53(6):695-702.
  3. Institute of Medicine [2011]. Incorporating occupational information in electronic health records. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  4. NIOSH. NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2011160.
  5. Schulte PA, Pandalai S, Wulsin V, Chun HK [2011]. Interaction of occupational and personal risk factors in workforce health and safety. Published ahead of print on October 20, 2011 as 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300249 the latest version is at http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/AJPH.2011.300249v1.
  6. Schulte PA, Vainio H [2010]. Well-being at work – overview and perspective. Scan J Work Environ Health 36(5):422-429.

Public Comments

Comments listed below are posted by individuals not associated with CDC, unless otherwise stated. These comments do not represent the official views of CDC, and CDC does not guarantee that any information posted by individuals on this site is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. Read more about our comment policy ».

  1. December 22, 2011 at 3:50 pm ET  -   David Wilson

    Integrating individual characteristis into a health risk assessment brings up new concerns of workplace screenings associated with personal medical data and genetics. I believe these factors are an important part of a full risk assessment.

    Our Central New York American Industrial Hygiene Association Local Section is co-sponsoring an all day Technical Conference on March 21, 2012 at Syracuse, NY. Could someone from your organization or can you recommend someone to present a 50 minute presentation on this subject?

    Thank you.
    David Wilson, CIH

    Link to this comment

    • January 11, 2012 at 3:49 am ET  -   Paul Schulte

      Thank you for your interest and invitation. We will contact you directly to discuss further.

      Link to this comment

  2. December 23, 2011 at 11:24 am ET  -   Davey Hardy

    That shortage is impairing provision of essential, life-saving interventions such as childhood immunizations, safe pregnancy and childbirth services for mothers, and access to treatment for AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. As a result, people are suffering and dying needlessly.

    Link to this comment

  3. December 23, 2011 at 2:55 pm ET  -   Dustin Fox, LMT

    After many attempts to educate employers and workers regarding the short and longterm effects of stress on the physiology, I fail to understand what is so difficult to fathom. Stress is the mankiller and it does have a definite impact on not only the bottom line but also the individual share of health costs. The outcomes that can be derived from an onsite massage lead to a more balanced, alert and safer work force. The reason predominately given as “not interested” is due to the perception of corp. liability. Having said that, most licensed massage professionals who would offer their services to a Corp. carry their own liability coverage and can add the corp to the policy so they may be covered. We aren’t talking about brain surgery here we are offering a way to reduce the effects of the accumulation of stress.

    Link to this comment

  4. December 28, 2011 at 1:04 pm ET  -   Jessica

    I do hope that this organization like this will always be supported by the government coz this is very essential to everyone.

    Link to this comment

  5. January 3, 2012 at 8:31 am ET  -   James Trevor

    Health and wellness management is a term applied to corporate programmes that help employees balance the needs of their work, lives, and mental and physical health.

    Link to this comment

  6. January 4, 2012 at 9:10 am ET  -   Andrew Stephenson

    Keep up spreading the word! I’d like to add to the “growing body of evidence” for the organizational benefits of combining both health/wellness and safety/injury prevention initiatives into one comprehensive program with personal experience.

    We have helped organizations run these combined integrated programs in Australia for more than a decade – and even amongst traditionally difficult work populations (aging, male dominant, blue collar) we have seen that including both personal health improvement with safety initiatives enhances the outcomes in all aspects of the program from participation right through both health improvement and injury reductions.

    Now offering these programs here in the U.S., but finding a lot of silo approaches still (HR/Benefits looking after wellness while EHS looks after safety). There is a very strong business case emerging for combining health and safety. Hopefully this trend catches on – cause at the end of the day we all want to see healthy and injury-free workers.

    Link to this comment

  7. January 9, 2012 at 10:38 am ET  -   Tom

    Occupational health providers are having to move beyond reactive to proactive – yes, there are interventions that must be carried out, but encouraging employees to refer themselves to services that are in fact benefits can cut down problems, cut down absence and improve productivity – it’s a win-win but so few businesses seem to see it that way.

    Link to this comment

  8. January 12, 2012 at 2:31 am ET  -   John Cruise

    Occupational health issues are not only restricted to physical health but mental health too. It can lead to stress and anxiety disorders and curing anxiety with anxiety treatments becomes necessary.

    Link to this comment

  9. January 16, 2012 at 11:43 am ET  -   patient appointment scheduling

    Employers should consider the well being of their employees as part of the factors that affect productivity and profitability of an organization. It is sad to know the amount of risks that employees are exposed to at their places of work. It is usually negligence of the of the employers that exposes their employees to such risks that can be prevented or their effects mitigated.

    Link to this comment

  10. January 23, 2012 at 9:18 am ET  -   grerially

    Hello! Just want to say thank you for this interesting article! =) Peace, Joy.

    Link to this comment

  11. April 19, 2012 at 4:21 pm ET  -   Simon

    I must say that, people aren’t told what is healthy. The best things that anyone should use to improve their health are the things that, rather than fix a problem, keeps the body in such a condition that it can handle the things it faces. In my opinion, things tought in eastern culture is very understated in western world. I know, from my own experience, that things like yoga really, really works.

    Link to this comment

  12. January 21, 2014 at 12:52 am ET  -   Mike Wilson

    Great insight. Thanks for sharing such an informative article. Corporate health issues also affect mental anxiety as a result of which people addicts themselves to alcohols and drugs. Thus the problem should not be overlooked and needs to be treated at the earliest.

    Link to this comment

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

All comments posted become a part of the public domain, and users are responsible for their comments. This is a moderated site and your comments will be reviewed before they are posted. Read more about our comment policy »

 
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #