Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

State-based Occupational Safety and Health Surveillance

Posted on by Yvonne Boudreau, MD, MSPH, Liz Dalsey, MA, and Max Kiefer, MS, CIH

How did NIOSH and its partners find out that dusty work conditions were putting highway repair workers at risk for developing a potentially severe lung disease called silicosis? The answer: state-based occupational health surveillance. Occupational health surveillance, which is the tracking of occupational injuries, illnesses, hazards and exposures for the purposes of improving worker safety and health and monitoring trends and progress over time, plays a vital role in worker protection. Surveillance data are used by the safety and health community to inform real-world safety and health prevention efforts and focus resources to protect workers. For example, New Jersey’s identification of silicosis in road construction workers led to incorporation of protective language into the New Jersey Department of Transportation’s road repair contracts. This language directs contractors to establish an approved Silica Safety and Health Program when airborne crystalline silica exceeds the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL).* Given its significance, Dr. Tom Frieden, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has designated enhancing public health surveillance as a priority agency objective.

Tracking occupational injuries, illnesses, hazards and exposures has always been integral to the NIOSH mission. NIOSH surveillance complements important statistical or surveillance activities carried out by other Federal agencies (including the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Mine Safety and Health Administration, and the National Center for Health Statistics), state governments, and private sector groups, such as employers. Data collected by all of these sources are essential for successful nationwide occupational health surveillance. States have a vital role to play in this endeavor.

Surveillance at NIOSH involves activities that are both intramural (within NIOSH) and extramural (outside of NIOSH). Within NIOSH, we focus on surveillance and collect and analyze data in a variety of occupational areas including respiratory diseases, non-respiratory diseases (e.g., dermatitis, cancer, lead, and pesticide poisoning), mining, commercial aviation, commercial fishing, and occupational injuries and fatalities. (See Surveillance Publications and Other Resources.)

Extramurally, through cooperative agreements, NIOSH supports occupational health surveillance efforts in state health departments and other agencies. These cooperative agreements provide financial and technical resources to build occupational health capacity in the states and to support more in-depth surveillance programs in areas of importance to the states. Capacity building, at a minimum, requires the collection of Occupational Health Indicators (OHI). Created collaboratively by the states and NIOSH, OHI establish a baseline view of state-specific occupational health conditions from which programs are able to track trends.

In addition to the OHI, some states have established expanded programs that focus surveillance activities on one or more health conditions, injuries, or worker populations of special interest or of high priority to the state. These focused efforts involve more in-depth data acquisition, analysis, and dissemination using existing or new data and/or new case finding and case follow-up. Importantly, these focused efforts also provide opportunities to develop new approaches to interventions to reduce exposures, illness and injury. Examples of priority focus areas include work-related asthma (WRA) surveillance, the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks-Pesticides (SENSOR-Pesticides), and the Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) Program.

Ideally, all states would have the core capacity to conduct surveillance of occupational injuries, diseases, and hazards that would contribute to state and local prevention efforts and to national data. In addition, states would have the ability to conduct focused, in-depth surveillance, follow-up investigations and intervention for selected, targeted diseases, injuries or hazards that they find to be important in their state.

Given inevitable resource constraints, NIOSH recognizes that it is not realistic to expect all states to conduct in-depth surveillance for all occupational conditions at the present time. To assist states, a recent publication, Guidelines for Minimum and Comprehensive State-Based Public Health Activities in Occupational Safety and Health, prepared by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and NIOSH, provides guidelines for states with minimal resources to address occupational safety and health issues in their states.

NIOSH state-based programs have demonstrated numerous successes in preventing work-related injury and disease. Examples include:

  • In Massachusetts and Michigan, utilizing their respective state surveillance systems, new substances that cause WRA were identified, confirmed, and published in peer-reviewed literature.
  • In Oregon and Massachusetts, child labor laws were changed to reduce teen injuries by controlling working hours and requiring additional supervision.
  • In Washington and California, heat illness protection standards for outdoor workers were developed to prevent deaths from heat stroke.
  • New Jersey and California adopted masonry “dry cutting laws” to reduce worker exposure to crystalline silica dust.
  • In Wisconsin, the state has succeeded in reducing the number of workers with high blood lead levels by 90% since 1988.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is interested in learning about the experiences of others who have expertise in this area or are currently working to improve state-based occupational safety and health surveillance. Please share your story.

Dr. Boudreau is the Deputy Director of the NIOSH Western States Office

Ms. Dalsey is a Health Communications Specialist at the NIOSH Western States Office

Mr. Kiefer is the Director of the NIOSH Western States Office

*Example changed based on reader input

Posted on by Yvonne Boudreau, MD, MSPH, Liz Dalsey, MA, and Max Kiefer, MS, CIH

2 comments on “State-based Occupational Safety and Health Surveillance”

Comments listed below are posted by individuals not associated with CDC, unless otherwise stated. These comments do not represent the official views of CDC, and CDC does not guarantee that any information posted by individuals on this site is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. Read more about our comment policy ».

    My name is Ken Scott and I work for one of the seventeen “Education and Research Centers” that NIOSH supports at universities throughout the U.S.

    At the Mountain & Plains ERC in Colorado, we are very grateful for the momentum that Dr. Boudreau and the Western States Office have generated around OSH surveillance. Throughout our seven-state region, we have seen evidence of real progress on OSH surveillance, due in large part to the enthusiasm and hard work of the Western States Office.

    For instance, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (the state health department in CO) was recently awarded one of NIOSH’s state-based surveillance grants (PAR-09-184). CDPHE will use that grant to develop a formal occupational surveillance program where none existed previously. The State of Wyoming recently hired an occupational epidemiologist to conduct surveillance activities with the hope of lowering their notably high occupational fatality rate. Other states in the region (e.g. Montana) are developing the OHI Reports Dr. Boudreau mentioned in her article. Since an OHI Report is often the “first step” to developing a more robust surveillance program (this was the case in both CO and WY), there is reason to believe that OSH surveillance will continue to improve throughout the West.

    The MAP ERC is proud to have been involved with some of NIOSH’s efforts. We work with NIOSH, CSTE and other western states to put on an annual conference (called WestON) devoted explicitly to surveillance in the West. We have been able to help produce some of those OHI Reports that generate awareness and attention to OSH issues. We have even recruited a team of graduate students we support through the ERC to help CDPHE develop their formal OSH surveillance program.

    While surveillance work is never done, we’d like to thank NIOSH (and Dr. Boudreau in particular) for taking the lead on this critical public health issue.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted become a part of the public domain, and users are responsible for their comments. This is a moderated site and your comments will be reviewed before they are posted. Read more about our comment policy »

TOP