Categories: Healthcare-associated infections, NHSN, State HAI Prevention
November 9th, 2010 4:00 pm ET -
.

Dr. Scott Fridkin
Author – Dr. Scott Fridkin
Deputy Chief of Surveillance Branch
CDC’s Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion
A tenet of public health practice is that public health surveillance systems evolve in response to ever-changing needs of both society in general and the public health community in particular. In the case of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), the needs of patients, providers, other consumers, and payors of healthcare have become drivers of recent evolution—although sometimes they are driving in different directions. Prior to this shift, objectives of HAI surveillance have been to provide local data for local action combined with the facilitating smart policy based on national HAI trends. Recently, the needs of HAI surveillance have changed to include state-wide tracking; state-wide, regional, or national prevention assessments; and importantly, public reporting of facility-specific HAIs.
It has been challenging to revise the system to meet these newer objectives, but success has occurred as national and state summary statistics have been published for some HAIs. However, as reporting of certain HAIs becomes mandatory for facilities to receive payment as part of CMS’s IPPS, two critical issues arise. First, there is a risk of losing the balance between the burden of data collection and the benefit of having local data for action. Programs with scarce resources risk spending substantial time on surveillance and less time using data to evaluate HAI efforts. Secondly, NHSN methodology includes inherent differences in the way infection prevention teams implement NHSN operations; despite tremendous efforts at standardizing case finding approaches and applying standardized definitions, there remains subjectivity.
2 Comments -
Read more
Categories: Healthcare-associated infections, Organ Transplant Safety
November 4th, 2010 7:13 am ET -

Balamuthia mandrillaris trophozoites
Author – Matthew J. Kuehnert, MD
Director, Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety
CDC Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion
In our last blog, we discussed the balance between organ availability and safety. Today, we describe recent CDC investigations of transplant-transmitted infections and their implications for this area of healthcare. Because the U.S. does not have a system to monitor disease transmission from organ transplantation, we must learn from those few cases that are recognized.
Some of the most difficult investigations involve multiple transplant patients from the same donor becoming ill from an unknown cause. This was the case in two recent clusters of transplant-transmitted Balamuthia ameba infection. In the first investigation, there were four transplant recipients; two recipients became very ill (one died), while two others remain asymptomatic. The second cluster of cases is a similar tragedy, with two recipient deaths. In both investigations, the donor had undiagnosed encephalitis (i.e., brain infection).
6 Comments -
Read more
Categories: Healthcare-associated infections, Organ Transplant Safety
October 28th, 2010 7:09 am ET -

Matthew J. Kuehnert, MD
Author – Matthew J. Kuehnert, MD
Director, Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety
CDC Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion
More than 100,000 people in this country anxiously await an organ transplant. Some people will receive a live-saving transplant eventually; however, an average of 18 of the sickest people on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) wait list die each day waiting for an organ. There is a risk of dying from the transplant too. Given the dire need for organs, sometimes organs are used from donors that have risks for disease. So how safe do transplants need to be?
Before organs are recovered from the donor, the donor’s medical and behavioral history are reviewed. This is difficult because next of kin or friends may not know all the answers. Donors also are screened for a variety of potentially infectious diseases through laboratory tests. That said, with the exception of those testing positive for HIV, no donor is required to be excluded.
It is estimated that 1% of organs transplanted in the U.S. each year harbors a disease that comes from the donor (i.e., donor-derived disease) – either an infection or cancer. However, this number likely is an underestimate – we only know what is recognized and reported. Examples of transmitted pathogens or diseases include an array of parasites, fungi, bacteria, and viruses – from emerging and unusual infections such as Balamuthia, rabies, and lymphochoriomenigitis virus (LCMV) to the more common but equally devastating infections such as tuberculosis, West Nile virus, and hepatitis C virus.�
8 Comments -
Read more
Categories: ARRA, Healthcare-associated infections, State HAI Prevention
October 26th, 2010 11:01 am ET -
.

Jessica Rigler, MPH, CHES
Guest author – Jessica Rigler, MPH, CHES
Healthcare-associated Infections Coordinator
Arizona Department of Health Services
In September 2009, the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) received funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) to develop infrastructure to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and create a new HAI Coordinator position. As the Arizona HAI Coordinator, I have had the opportunity to work with a number of dedicated and enthusiastic partners to coordinate statewide efforts towards HAI prevention. Key activities accomplished just in the last year include:
- Establishment of the Arizona HAI Program
- Authorship of the Arizona HAI Plan
- Creation of the multidisciplinary HAI Advisory Committee
- Assessment of HAI prevention priorities and educational needs of healthcare providers
- Development of an HAI program website to provide resources and links to nationwide HAI data to healthcare providers and the public
- Coordination between epidemiologists and the state survey agency to improve communication about HAI prevention and control
9 Comments -
Read more
Categories: ARRA, Healthcare-associated infections
October 20th, 2010 3:19 pm ET -

Joni Young, MS
Author – Joni Young, MS
CDC’s Healthcare-associated Infections Recovery Act Program Coordinator
Just over a year ago, I was putting together a team of public health analysts to support state health department healthcare-associated infection prevention programs. We had $40M in grants, 51 new grantees, and 28 months to accomplish what some would say is impossible — to build a national public health infrastructure aimed at eliminating healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We were overwhelmed by the positive response from state health departments during a summer of H1N1 and other competing priorities. This demonstrated a commitment from the states to prevent HAIs. We began this partnership with a sense that we could accomplish anything with each others’ support.
September marked the first anniversary of the HAI Program. The 51 grantees funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) (49 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico) implemented strategies to prevent HAIs, making healthcare safer across the nation.
In just 12 months, the HAI Program:
4 Comments -
Read more